Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
back
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Adam Marcini wrote:

Hi, guys —

I am a practicing Catholic and I have a question in regards to the ascendancy of the Pope. My friends and I are arguing about how a Pope actually becomes a Pope.

My contention is that he is elected by the cardinals.

Their contention is that he has a series of tasks he must complete.

Also, there is an argument about how a bishop becomes a bishop.

  • Were there any layman Bishops?

My friends contend that in the Middle Ages, the Bishop of Canterbury was always a lay person. My friends also contend that a layman can become Pope.

  • Is this theoretically true?
  • Is there old Papal doctrine allowing for this?

Please respond quickly.

The loser has to treat the other to dinner. I do not want to pay.

Adam

  { How does a Pope actually become a Pope, a Bishop become a Bishop, and were there any layman Bishops? }

Eric replied:

Hey Adam, guess what, you win!

I have no clue where your friends get the idea that the Pope has to complete a series of tasks. Here is a good, if unofficial, article on the subject:

A bishop becomes a bishop in most places by direct appointment by the Pope (who is assisted in the selection by the Papal Nuncio, or ambassador, in that country).

In other places, in the Eastern Catholic churches in:

  • Lebanon
  • Syria
  • Ukraine
  • India
  • and other places

bishops are elected by a synod of other bishops and approved by the Pope.

The idea of a "layman bishop" is contradictory; as soon as one is ordained a bishop, one ceases to be a layman. (A cleric is a deacon, priest, or bishop.) Anyone not a cleric or a religious (consecrated virgin/celibate) is a lay person. However, while exceedingly rare and probably never done in modern times, it is possible for a layman to be selected as a bishop, in which case he is quickly ordained deacon and priest before being ordained a bishop.

The Archbishop of Canterbury has never been a lay person. It is possible they are confusing:

Your friends are right, however, in that theoretically, any Catholic lay man can be elected Pope (although he has to be ordained a deacon, priest, and bishop before assuming the office), but again, this has probably never happened beyond the first millennium.

By the way, we take a cut of bet proceeds. ;-)

Eric Ewanco

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.